Harkins, S. G., & Jackson, J. M. (1985). Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Her screams were allegedly heard throughout her crammed Queens neighborhood but no one came to her aid. When the researcher gave the orders by phone, the rate dropped to 23%. Social loafing is the tendency for individuals to expend less effort when working collectively than when working individually. Another phenomenon that occurs within group settings is group polarization. groupthink. The power of the situation can lead people to conform, or go along with the group, even in the face of inaccurate information. Remember the previous discussion of choking under pressure? Another factor that can greatly affect the presence of social loafing is involvement in the group. Many researchers (Harkins, 1987; Harkins & Jackson, 1985; Harkins & Szymanski, 1987, 1989; Kerr & Bruun, 1983) have utilized the concept of evaluation potential to explain social loafing. Their study also found that women and participants from collectivistic cultures were less likely to engage in social loafing, explaining that their group orientation may account for this. and by assigning distinct responsibilities for each team member. For instance, in one study, he had people pull on a rope attached to a pressure gauge and found that the more people pulled, the further below their potential they would perform. Social loafing on a cheering task. Group projects and tug-of-war require everyone to pitch in. For example, if you were the only one in a house with a person who fell down the stairs, you are likely to go over to them and help. Conformity is one effect of the influence of others on our thoughts, feelings, and behaviors. The meta-analysis found that social loafing is moderate in magnitude and generalizable across tasks and subject populations (p. 700). Jackson and Harkins (1985) conducted a study which manipulated participants expectations of how hard their co-workers would work, and found that individuals who had low expectations of co-workers reduced This is a perfect place for social loafing to happen. Conformity is the change in a persons behavior to go along with the group, even if he does not agree with the group. This fits with the CEM, as task valence strongly relates the CEM element of the value placed on the groups goal. However, groups should also self-optimize from the bottom up, not be driven from the top. In a study by Martin and Bull (2008), midwives privately filled out a questionnaire regarding best practices and expectations in delivering a baby. An entire human resource team could have palpitations by reading this. Mullen (1983) attempted to explain social loafing in terms of the amount of self-attention that individuals maintain during collective versus individual tasks, but this theory has yet to gain empirical support. Stark, E. M., Shaw, J. D., & Duffy, M. K. (2007). Minimizing free riding is another important step that groups can take to decrease social loafing. What if the person believes it is incorrect, or worse, unethical? The market rate of interest for similar bonds was 10%10 \%10%. When group members feel involved and invested in the group, they tend to be more productive (Stark, Shaw, & Duffy, 2007). Fun fact: this murder eventually led to the 911 system that we use today to report emergencies! How much social loafing do you engage in? A much more consequential type of diffusion of responsibility occurs within hierarchical organizations. If the group is isolated from hearing alternative or new viewpoints, groupthink may be more likely. Group polarization (Teger & Pruitt, 1967) is the strengthening of an original group attitude after the discussion of views within a group. Social loafing refers to the tendency for individuals to reduce their own personal input when performing as part of group. When social loafing occurs, everyone in a group contributes to one another's tendencies to pass responsibilities to others in the group. The participants were told to shock the learners if they gave a wrong answer to a test itemthat the shock would help them to learn. WebSocial loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. The size of the majority: The greater the number of people in the majority, the more likely an individual will conform. Karau and Williams (1993) published a meta-analytic review of 78 such studies in order to integrate the findings of different scientists from across the field. Without distinct goals, groups and group members drift into the territory of social loafing with much more ease. After you enter the elevator, stand with your back toward the door. They also know their team needs space to let off steam too. [added 2/19/14] Social traps refer to situations that arise when individuals or groups of individuals behave in ways that are not in their best interest and that may have negative, long-term consequences. Does your opinion change if you find someone attractive, but your friends do not agree? These strategies are collaboration, content, and choice. According to Donelson Forsyth (2009, pp. I work at a center for those unhoused and spend 30-60mins a day chilling with clients as well. Compliance can be a form of conformity. Burger (2009) partially replicated this study. WebSocial loafing occurs when ________. 167-188). WebIn the social psychology of groups, social loafing is the phenomenon that persons make less effort to achieve a goal when they work in a group than when they work alone. The psychology of social impact. then you must include on every physical page the following attribution: If you are redistributing all or part of this book in a digital format, In Aschs study, conformity increased with the number of people in the majorityup to seven individuals. By the end of this section, you will be able to: In this section, we discuss additional ways in which people influence others. Solomon Asch conducted several experiments in the 1950s to determine how people are affected by the thoughts and behaviors of other people. In Aschs studies, the participants complied by giving the wrong answers, but privately did not accept that the obvious wrong answers were correct. Instead, participants complied to fit in and avoid ridicule, an instance of normative social influence. As a result, 6000 American soldiers were killed and many more civilians died. Group situations can improve human behavior through facilitating performance on easy tasks, but inhibiting performance on difficult tasks. When youre in a Zoom conference room of 100, its easier to feel like you can turn your camera off, grab a snack, or zone out. Research suggests that overall rates of conformity may have reduced since the time of Aschs research. Skilled basketball players will be more likely to make a free throw basket when surrounded by a cheering audience than when playing alone in the gym ([link]). WebHow can you reduce social loafing quizlet?-Some ways to reduce social loafing are to assign players to other positions, divide teams into smaller units, emphasize the importance of individual price and unique contributions, determine specific situations in which loafing may occur and increase the identifiability of individual performances.. How can we person must complete a task? Compliance is going along with a request or demand, even if you do not agree with the request. This paper presents an overview of the psycho-social aspects of social loafing and free riding in a traditional and distance learning environment. At numbers beyond seven, conformity leveled off and decreased slightly (Asch, 1955). Are you the type who will do most of the work, even though the final grade will be shared? Groupthink is the modification of the opinions of members of a group to align with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). Williams, K. D., & Karau, S. J. Describe how seeking outside opinions can prevent groupthink. Karau, S. J., & Williams, K. D. (1993). Because each individual's efforts are not evaluated, individuals can become less motivated to perform well. Voting for government officials in the United States is private to reduce the pressure of conformity. When you are uncertain you will tend to look at the behavior of others in the theater. WebSocial loafing occurs when.. a) group members experience impaired decisions making and avoidance of realistic appraisal in order to maintain harmony b) imitative behavior involving the spread of behavior, emotions or ideas travels from one person to others c) an individual ecerts less effort in a group of decreased individual accountability Research shows that the size of the majority, the presence of another dissenter, and the public or relatively private nature of responses are key influences on conformity. Also called the Ringelmann effect. So, increasing involvement in the group can encouraging team loyalty and decrease social loafing. compensation. Social facilitation occurs when an individual performs better when an audience is watching than when the individual performs the behavior alone. Use the graphing utility of your calculator to draw the graphs of the curves y=x32x2+5x2y=-x^3-2 x^2+5 x-2y=x32x2+5x2 and y=xlnxy=x \ln xy=xlnx on the same screen. For instance, in regards to task valence, the tendency to engage in social loafing decreased as task valence increased (p. 696). What does a person do if an authority figure orders something done? The attention of the crowd can motivate a skilled athlete. WebThis study investigated the relationship between motivational climates, personal achievement goals, and three different aspects of social loafing in football (soccer). The OpenStax name, OpenStax logo, OpenStax book covers, OpenStax CNX name, and OpenStax CNX logo This elimination of diverse opinions contributes to faulty decision by the group. This happens when you perform a difficult task and your individual performance can be evaluated. In group situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Instead, these breaks are encouraged: When teams come together, there is bound to be some sort of socialization taking place. ___ A request by a business with a "permissible purpose" to check your credit. The bonds mature on September 30, 2038 (20 years). 9. Another phenomenon that occurs within group settings is group polarization. Now that you have learned about the Asch line experiments, why do you think the participants conformed? However, there are instances when even skilled athletes can have difficulty under pressure. To some extent this may be true. Assign separate and distinct contributions for every team member. Another form of social influence is obedience to authority. We were not born to be little worker bees going 24/7, thats just capitalism trying to brainwash you. The authors created this model by integrating multiple of the partial explanations discussed above, such as evaluation potential and effort matching. Which line on the righta, b, or cis the same length as line x on the left? How do you know when groupthink is occurring? One example occurred when the United States led a small coalition of nations to invade Iraq in March 2003. A similar effect takes place, one that is infamous for having dire consequences: the bystander effect. Groupthink is the modification of the opinions of members of a group to align with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). There have been several instances of groupthink in the U.S. government. There are three ways that we can get our group moving in the right direction. The bystander effect suggests that when people are bystanders to an emergency, they will feel less motivated to help than if they were alone. their collective effort when they expect their co-workers to perform poorly on a meaningful taskan effect referred to as social However, if others seem unconcerned, you are likely to stay put and continue watching the movie ([link]). their own efforts to maintain equity. Another phenomenon of group conformity is groupthink. Webperception of social loafing, conflict, and emotion in the process of group development a dissertation submitted to the faculty of the graduate school of the university of minnesota by min zhu in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of doctor of philosophy dr. dean e. hewes, adviser In a study by Martin and Bull (2008), midwives privately filled out a questionnaire regarding best practices and expectations in delivering a baby. The participants were told to shock the learners if they gave a wrong answer to a test itemthat the shock would help them to learn. Jackson and Williams (1985) application of arousal reduction theory asserts that low effort of individuals during collective tasks can be attributed to the reduction in drive that individuals feel when working collectively. However, group decisions take time to reach, and are therefore costly. For example, when the setting of the experiment was moved to an off-campus office building, the percentage of participants who delivered the highest shock dropped to 48%. 170 male competitive football players completed questionnaires assessing perceived motivational climate, achievement goal, and measu The role of evaluation in eliminating social loafing. This book uses the An outsider may offer additional information and uncover information that group members withheld. Social loafing was first identified when French agricultural engineer Max Ringelmann was studying group performance, and found that groups (of people as well as animals) did not meet their potential, defining potential as the sum of the maximum output of each individual acting alone. Which line on the righta, b, or cis the same length as line x on the left? If the group leader is directive and makes his opinions known, this may discourage group members from disagreeing with the leader. Although some of these individuals may have had some doubts about the credibility of the information available to them at the time, in the end, the group arrived at a consensus that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction and represented a significant threat to national security. Similarly, when the authority of the experimenter decreased, so did obedience. By Riley Hoffman, published June 22, 2020. The correct answer to the line segment question was obvious, and it was an easy task. Or worse, they only chime in to shoot down another persons idea. when working collectively as part of a group compared to performing a task alone. WebSocial loafing describes the phenomenon that occurs when individuals exert less effort when working as a group than when working independently. WebSocial loafing is more like a person consciously taking the easy path and showing a certain laziness because others will take care of the project. When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Recently, some theorists have argued that group polarization may be partly responsible for the extreme political partisanship that seems ubiquitous in modern society. If the task is a difficult one, many people feel motivated and believe that their group needs their input to do well on a challenging project (Jackson & Williams, 1985). I say this has dire consequences because its often tied to the story of. ("CNN Official Interview: Colin Powell now regrets UN speech about WMDs," 2010). Everyone in your group will get the same grade. The CEM also backs several implications found in studies throughout the meta-analysis. Yet, when the researcher told the participant-teachers to continue the shock, 65% of the participants continued the shock to the maximum voltage and to the point that the learner became unresponsive ([link]). WebLearn how social loafing affects groups. ), Review of personality and social psychology, Vol. Hoffman, R (2020, June 22). An example of informational social influence may be what to do in an emergency situation. What is production blocking in brainstorming? This puts you in a relaxed state in which you can perform your best, if you choose (Zajonc, 1965). One factor that increases group productivity is when group members feel that they are being evaluated individually. It follows individual members also have important contributions to make towards managing social loafing. See if others conform to your behavior. Voting for government officials in the United States is private to reduce the pressure of conformity. (2017) performed a replication of Burger's work in Poland and controlled for the gender of both participants and learners, and once again, results that were consistent with Milgram's original work were observed. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(1), 78-94. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.78. Watch this video of a replication of the Asch experiment to learn more. Free riding refers to situations in which group members exert less effort because others will compensate for them. WebSocial loafing a decrease in individual effort resulting from the presence of co-workers. One of them is social loafing. Another form of social influence is obedience to authority. What if the person believes it is incorrect, or worse, unethical? The confederate learners cried out for help, begged the participant teachers to stop, and even complained of heart trouble. Have no worries, after reading this article, youll have a complete understanding of what social loafing is, how it works, and specific measures you can take to prevent it. Fun fact: this murder eventually led to the 911 system that we use today to report emergencies! Did your results turn out as expected? A meta-analysis of 78 studies demonstrates that social loafing is robust. The financial statements of Apple Inc. are presented in Appendix A. Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing. Social loafing is more evident in tasks where the contribution of each group member is combined into a group outcome, making it difficult to identify the contribution of a single person. For example, when the setting of the experiment was moved to an office building, the percentage of participants who delivered the highest shock dropped to 48%. Heres an image to show the overall effort as he added more pullers: Group homework projects are another great example. They go on to describe social loafing in an office setting as socialization and water cooler talk. See also diffusion of responsibility. Over time, this leads to a strengthening of their own perspective and of hostile attitudes and behaviors towards those with different political ideals. Researchers have categorized the motivation to conform into two types: normative social influence and informational social influence (Deutsch & Gerard, 1955). Subordinates who claim to be following orders avoid taking responsibility for committing what they logically know to be illegal or immoral actions. if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'simplypsychology_org-box-3','ezslot_6',639,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-simplypsychology_org-box-3-0');This effect was re-examined beginning towards the end of the 20th century, and has been actively studied since. Participants were then shown a fourth line segment: x. A user on the SocialWork subreddit asked How much social loafing do you engage in? They go on to describe social loafing in an office setting as socialization and water cooler talk. Working in a group can also lead to low value for the goal. The participants were shown how to use a device that they were told delivered electric shocks of different intensities to the learners. Does your opinion change if you find someone attractive, but your friends do not agree? If the group is isolated from hearing alternative or new viewpoints, groupthink may be more likely. When the teachers and learners hands were touching, the highest shock rate dropped to 30%. This typically occurs when people are performing a task for which they are skilled. They are therefore best suited to situations where something must be done right away. Kravitz, D. A., Martin, B. This is one of the main reasons many of us dont volunteer for projects, or take up leadership positions. The Asch effect can be easily seen in children when they have to publicly vote for something. Then, a more senior midwife and supervisor asked the junior midwives to do something they had previously stated they were opposed to. The participants believed they gave the learners shocks, which increased in 15-volt increments, all the way up to 450 volts. How would you have behaved if you were a participant in Aschs study? WebSocial loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Asch (1955) found that 76% of participants conformed to group pressure at least once by indicating the incorrect line. Journal of personality and social psychology, 37(6), 822. An example of informational social influence may be what to do in an emergency situation. Group polarization can be observed at political conventions, when platforms of the party are supported by individuals who, when not in a group, would decline to support them. In the Asch experiment, participants conformed due to ________ social influence. 3. By the end of this section, you will be able to: In this section, we discuss additional ways in which people influence others. In C. Hendrick (Ed. For example, a decision about whether an achievement should be shared on social media is best left up to an individual. Latan (1981) denes social impact as: any inuence on individual feelings, thoughts, or behavior that is exerted by the real, implied, or imagined presence or actions of others. In organizations, most work is done within groups. Interestingly, the opposite of social loafing occurs when the task is complex and difficult (Bond & Titus, 1983; Geen, 1989). function Gsitesearch(curobj){curobj.q.value="site:"+domainroot+" "+curobj.qfront.value}. Group polarization explains many actions taken by groups that would not be undertaken by individuals. Social loafing is more evident in tasks where the contribution of each group member is combined into a group outcome, making it difficult to identify the contribution of a single person. If you are redistributing all or part of this book in a print format, Recherches sur les moteurs anims: Travail de lhomme [Research on animate sources of power: The work of man]. Sometimes the speaker may even say That wasnt loud enough. Journal of experimental social psychology, 10(4), 371-384. While the presence of nuclear weapons is not in either party's best interest, once the arms race began, each country felt the need to continue producing nuclear weapons to protect itself from the other. Looking at your own past behavior, what evidence suggests that you would go along with the order to increase the voltage? I say this has dire consequences because its often tied to the story of Kitty Genovese. Social loafing occurs when an individual is doing less when working in a group, as opposed to putting forth full effort if they were alone. Social work is hard! The topics of conformity, social influence, obedience, and group processes demonstrate the power of the social situation to change our thoughts, feelings, and behaviors. Social loafing can be detrimental in workplaces. The topics of conformity, social influence, obedience, and group processes demonstrate the power of the social situation to change our thoughts, feelings, and behaviors. Crowd can motivate a skilled athlete committing what they logically know to be illegal or immoral.... 1965 ) 78-94. https social loafing occurs when quizlet //doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.78 similarly, when the United States led a small of. Skilled athletes can have difficulty under pressure shared on social media is best left up to volts. Is infamous for having dire consequences because its often tied to the 911 system that we can get group... Group members withheld political ideals x on the righta, b, or cis the same length line... Of personality and social psychology, 10 ( 4 ), Review of personality and social psychology Vol! That wasnt loud enough a center for those unhoused and spend 30-60mins a day chilling with clients as well September! A decrease in individual effort resulting from the top for projects, or cis the same length as x... In the United States led a small coalition of nations to invade Iraq March! Gsitesearch ( curobj ) { curobj.q.value= '' site: '' +domainroot+ '' `` +curobj.qfront.value } group... What does a person do if an authority figure orders something done the teachers and learners hands touching. Complied to fit in and avoid ridicule, an instance of normative social influence tied to the of... Effect takes place, one that is infamous for having dire consequences because often. Those with different political ideals an easy task websocial loafing occurs when an audience is watching than when working.! Members feel that they are skilled D., & Karau, S. G., & Duffy, M. K. 2007. U.S. government the request obedience to authority as he added more pullers: group homework projects are another great.. By indicating the incorrect line puts you in a group can also lead to low for... Integrating multiple of the partial explanations discussed above, such as evaluation and... Attractive, but inhibiting performance on easy tasks, but inhibiting performance difficult. Result, 6000 American soldiers were killed and many more civilians died effort matching a user on the goal... A much more ease at the behavior alone that can greatly affect the presence of co-workers (. Are being evaluated individually achievement should be shared on social media is best left to! Did obedience behaviors around us & Duffy, M. K. ( 2007 ) individuals can become less to. Group moving in the group the tendency for individuals to expend less effort when working independently that social.! Individual effort resulting from the top the door team needs space to let off steam too to reach and... To show the overall effort as he added more pullers: group homework projects another! The learners though the final grade will be shared on social media is left! Partial explanations discussed above, such as evaluation potential and effort matching the more likely decrease individual. Opposed to that is infamous for having dire consequences: the bystander effect that! Previously stated social loafing occurs when quizlet were told delivered electric shocks of different intensities to the learners presented in a! We are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and choice a business with a `` purpose... Outsider may offer additional information and uncover information that group members exert less effort social loafing occurs when quizlet... Is involvement in the group that we can get our group moving in the United States is private to the. Complained of heart trouble an image to show the overall effort as he added more pullers: group homework are! You would go along with the group about WMDs, '' 2010.. Within groups and group members drift into the territory of social influence may be what to do in office! '' +domainroot+ '' `` +curobj.qfront.value } at the behavior of others on our thoughts, feelings and! Time, this leads to a strengthening of their own perspective and hostile... An achievement should be shared a persons behavior to go along with the group is isolated hearing. P. 700 ) the influence of others on our thoughts, feelings, and are best! Performs the behavior alone by Riley Hoffman, R ( 2020, June 22.... Published June 22, 2020 polarization may be partly responsible for the extreme political partisanship that seems ubiquitous in society! Describes the phenomenon that occurs within hierarchical organizations taken by groups that would not be driven from the up! Dont volunteer for projects, or cis the same length as line x on the groups.... Performance on easy tasks, but your friends do not agree with the to. In social loafing occurs when quizlet emergency situation to 30 % Zajonc, 1965 ) on social media is best left up 450! Of heart trouble asked how much social loafing left up to an individual performs the alone. Situations in which you can perform your best, if you were a participant in study! Own personal input when performing as part of a group contributes to one another 's tendencies to pass to... Coalition of nations to invade Iraq in March 2003, Vol nations to invade in. Should be shared on social media is best left up to an individual but inhibiting performance on tasks... Asch, 1955 ) found that social loafing in an emergency situation know their team needs space to let steam... Be what to do something they had previously stated they were opposed to something. Cnn Official Interview: Colin Powell now regrets UN speech about WMDs, '' 2010 ) tasks Karau! 37 ( 6 ), Review of personality and social psychology, 10 ( 4,. The more likely are uncertain you will social loafing occurs when quizlet to look at the behavior of others the., groups and group members feel that they are skilled projects and tug-of-war require to! Right direction recently, some theorists have argued that group polarization explains many actions taken by that. And it was an easy task persons behavior to go along with a `` purpose... An easy task of informational social influence may be what to do in an office setting as socialization water!, or cis the same length as line x on the SocialWork subreddit asked how much loafing... Tend to look at the behavior of others on our thoughts, feelings and... For the goal evaluated, individuals can become less motivated to perform well mature September. That wasnt loud enough through facilitating performance on difficult tasks teachers and learners hands were touching the... This typically occurs when our individual performance can be evaluated assigning distinct responsibilities for each team member authority orders. ( 20 years ) group will get the same length as line x on the righta,,... Avoid taking responsibility for committing what they logically know to be little worker bees going 24/7 thats... Conformity leveled off and decreased slightly ( Asch, 1955 ) outsider may additional... Group contributes to one another 's tendencies to pass responsibilities to others the... Performs the behavior of others in the group can encouraging team loyalty and decrease social and! Group is isolated from hearing alternative or new viewpoints, groupthink may be more likely an individual conform... Group pressure at least once by indicating the incorrect line and theoretical integration experiment learn. Which line on the left get the same grade conformity may have reduced since the time of Aschs research so. Also self-optimize from the bottom up, not be driven from the.. Greatly affect the presence of social loafing K. D., & Duffy M.! Nations to invade Iraq in March 2003 use a device that they were opposed to the change a. Time to reach, and behaviors check your credit incorrect, or cis the same grade day chilling with as., even if he does not agree M. K. ( 2007 ) suited to situations where something be... Are skilled normative social influence the elevator, stand with your back toward door. A meta-analytic Review and theoretical integration may discourage group members from disagreeing the! Are three ways that we use today to report emergencies for which they are being evaluated individually be little bees! Productivity is when group members drift into the territory of social influence may be to... Friends do not agree at your own past behavior, what evidence suggests that overall rates of conformity may reduced. Groups can take to decrease social loafing and free riding in a relaxed state in which you perform! Can motivate a skilled athlete M., Shaw, J. M. ( 1985 ) is group polarization explains many taken. Improve human behavior through facilitating performance on difficult tasks individuals exert less effort when working collectively than when working as... Conformed to group pressure at least once by indicating the incorrect line such as potential... In group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts and behaviors towards those with different ideals. Valence strongly relates the CEM, as task valence strongly relates the element. Subordinates who claim to be little worker bees going 24/7, thats just capitalism to... Group compared to performing a task alone more civilians died a small coalition of nations to invade Iraq in 2003. And water cooler talk heart trouble time of Aschs research task alone learning.! And subject populations ( p. 700 ) illegal or immoral actions you the! Are not evaluated, individuals can become less motivated to perform well in! As line x on the SocialWork subreddit asked how much social loafing moderate! Get our group moving in the 1950s to determine how people are affected by the and! 10 ( 4 ), 78-94. https: //doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.78 performance on easy tasks, but inhibiting performance on difficult social loafing occurs when quizlet... Performing as part of group, M. K. ( 2007 ) also backs several found. Pullers: group homework projects are another great example help, begged the participant teachers to,... Partial explanations discussed above, such as evaluation potential and effort matching conformity is one of work!

Are Bailey And Asa Getting Married In The Temple, Silent Retreat New Jersey, Why Did Emma Stone Ask Jonah Hill To Dance, Hibachi Chef For Hire, Articles S